Committee for Justice Blog

This blog is for discussion of everything judicial: nominees, judges, the confirmation process, judicial philosophy, court decisions, constitutional issues, judicial activism. The views expressed here are those of the individual bloggers and do not necessarily represent the views of the Committee for Justice.

April 23, 2010

SCOTUS Nomination Round-Up

Potential Supreme Court pick Garland could find foes on left

Democrats Aim to Tap Populist Anger in High-Court Fight accessible via Google News

Obama considering former Detroit Public Schools teacher as Supreme Court nominee

Fit to Judge: What the Goodwin Liu hearings reveal about the judicial confirmation process

The Case For Diane Wood

Nine Supreme Court justices? Why not stick with eight?

posted by James R. Perkins at 9:40 AM

<< Home

Contributors

  • Zach Yost
  • Dylan
  • Christie
  • Emily Webb
  • Armen Boyajian
  • James M
  • Brandon
  • Lester Jackson
  • Tara Ross
  • Aaron
  • Curt Levey
  • Abigail Thernstrom
  • Doug
  • James R. Perkins
  • John Lott
  • Walter Olson
  • Walter Weber
  • Committee for Justice
  • Nicholas Maraman
  • Matt Evans
  • Nena Bartlett
  • Debbie Smith
  • Paradox
  • Christina Dahlman
  • Julie Axelrod
  • Kristian
  • Dillon Rosdahl
  • JSK
  • Stuart Buck

Previous Posts

  • 3 Reasons Why Obamacare is Unconstitutional Under ...
  • In WH meeting, the Two Republicans Were Only Ones ...
  • Obama's Short List
  • The Golden Age of Free Speech
  • Is Diane Wood the Public Option?
  • Is White House Signaling a Kagan Nomination?
  • Goodwin Liu & Clarence Thomas
  • In What Sense is the Personal Health Insurance Man...
  • Should Conservatives Rethink Judicial Activism?
  • Huh?

Powered by Blogger